Most traditional Laravel applications follow a monolithic architecture. It makes it difficult for apps to scale operations, maintain codebase performance and more. To ease the maintenance, ensure extensibility and improve security, it is important to break the monolith into modular services or packages.
Today we will discuss how to break down a Laravel monolith into reusable and manageable microservices with real-world examples.
What is a Laravel Monolith?
A monolith is a single, unified codebase where the entire application including frontend, backend logic, and database access exists together. While this setup works well for small projects or MVPs, in enterprises it can lead to:
- Spaghetti code
- Poor separation of concerns
- Deployment bottlenecks
- Harder team collaboration
What Are the Ways to Modularize a Laravel Monolith?
There are two primary approaches:
1. Laravel Packages (Modular Monolith)
Split your app into reusable, decoupled packages that live inside your Laravel app or a private composer repository.
2. Microservices (Service-Oriented Architecture)
Split the app into independent services, each with its own database and possibly its own codebase, communicating via HTTP or messaging queues.
When to Use Packages vs Microservices
Factor | Use Laravel Packages | Use Microservices |
App Size | Medium to Large | Large-scale or distributed systems |
Teams | Single or small team | Multiple independent teams |
Need for Deployment Speed | Shared deployment is acceptable | Independent service deployment is required |
Technical Complexity | Low to medium | High (DevOps, CI/CD, API Gateway, etc.) |
Option 1: Modularize with Laravel Packages
Step-by-Step: Creating a Laravel Package
Create a directory inside /packages:
Bash:
mkdir -p packages/YourVendor/UserManagement
Create a composer.json inside the package:
PHP:
{ "name": "your-vendor/user-management", "autoload": { "psr-4": { "YourVendor\\UserManagement\\": "src/" } }, "extra": { "laravel": { "providers": [ "YourVendor\\UserManagement\\UserManagementServiceProvider" ] } }
}
Register package path in root composer.json:
JSON:
"repositories": [ { "type": "path", "url": "packages/YourVendor/UserManagement" }
]
Add as dependency:
Bash:
composer require your-vendor/user-management
Package structure:
packages/
└── YourVendor/
└── UserManagement/
├── composer.json
├── src/
│ ├── Controllers/
│ ├── Models/
│ ├── Services/
│ └── UserManagementServiceProvider.php
Benefits of Laravel Packages:
- Code reuse across multiple Laravel apps
- Clean, maintainable architecture
- Test modules independently
- Helps teams work on isolated parts
Example: Extracting a Billing System to a Package
Let’s say you have billing logic spread across controllers and services. You can move all of this into a Billing package.
PHP:
// packages/Acme/Billing/src/Services/StripeBillingService.php
namespace Acme\Billing\Services;
class StripeBillingService
{ public function charge($user, $amount) { // Stripe logic }
}
Then use it in your app:
PHP:
use Acme\Billing\Services\StripeBillingService;
public function chargeUser(StripeBillingService $billing)
{ $billing->charge(auth()->user(), 4999);
}
Option 2: Breaking into Microservices
As your app grows, you may want full isolation between parts of your system — for example, separating the User Service, Order Service, and Payment Service.
Each service might be its own Laravel app, with its own database, deployment pipeline, and API.
Example Architecture:
- auth-service → Manages users and auth (OAuth2)
- billing-service → Handles Stripe, invoicing
- orders-service → Order creation and tracking
- Communication via REST API, gRPC, or message queues (e.g. RabbitMQ)
Benefits:
- Independent deployments
- Service-specific scaling
- Language-agnostic (a service could be in Node.js or Go)
Challenges:
- More DevOps complexity
- Distributed tracing & monitoring needed
- Network latency and reliability concerns
Transition Strategy from Monolith to Microservices
- Identify boundaries — Start with clear domain separation (User, Orders, Billing, etc.)
- Modularize as Packages — First, extract modules internally as Laravel packages.
- Build APIs — Slowly replace internal calls with HTTP or event-based communication.
- Move to separate services — Migrate isolated packages to standalone Laravel services.
Hybrid Approach: Modular Monolith + Microservices
For many teams, a hybrid approach works best. Start with modular packages, and migrate the most critical or high-load features into microservices later.
Final Thoughts
Breaking a Laravel monolith into services or packages is a strategic move toward scalability and maintainability. Start with small refactors, extract shared logic into packages, and only consider microservices when the complexity justifies the trade-offs.