Choosing between a modular monolith and microservices isn’t just a technical decision, it’s a strategic one. Each architecture serves different stages of a product’s lifecycle, different team sizes, and different scalability needs. If you are building a new .NET app from scratch, or planning to scale it, you should know the trade-offs and strengths of both the methods. This can help you avoid massive rewrite expenses down the road:
What is a Modular Monolith
A modular monolith is an architectural choice where your application is built as a single deployment unit, but it’s structured internally as independent, loosely-coupled modules with well-defined boundaries.
Think of it as a monolith with a clean architecture, it has modules separated logically, but they run in the same process.
What are Microservices
Microservices architecture involves breaking the application into independent, small services. Each service:
- Owns its data
- Has its own deployment pipeline
- Communicates with others via APIs (usually HTTP or messaging)
Think of each microservice as a mini-application with complete independence.
Purpose | Modular Monolith | Microservices |
Simplified internal structure | Yes | Not ideal |
Independent scaling of features | Not ideal | Yes |
Team autonomy for features | Partial | Full |
Better for early-stage/startups | Yes | Complex for small teams |
Deployment flexibility | One unit | Deploy individually |
Clear module boundaries | Yes | Yes |
Ecommerce System Example with Code Snippets
Modular Monolith Example
You build an app with the following internal modules:
- UserModule
- ProductModule
- OrderModule
- PaymentModule
They share the same:
- Database
- Codebase
- Deployment pipeline
Each module communicates internally via services/interfaces, but everything is packaged as a single deployable unit (e.g., a .NET Web API).
// ProductModule service
public class ProductService
{ public Product GetById(int id) { ... }
}
Microservices Example
You break the app into:
- UserService (runs on port 5001)
- ProductService (runs on port 5002)
- OrderService (runs on port 5003)
- PaymentService (runs on port 5004)
Each service:
- Has its own database
- Is deployed independently
- Communicates over HTTP (e.g., REST)
Example API Call:
GET http://product-service/api/products/1
Advantages of Monolith Architecture
- Easier to Develop: simpler architecture for small/medium teams
- Easy Debugging: All logic runs in one process, easy to trace bugs
- Easier Testing: End-to-end testing is simpler
- Faster Development: Less infrastructure overhead
- Cost Effective: No need for cloud-native orchestration (e.g., Kubernetes)
Advantages of Microservices Architecture
- Independent Deployment: Services can be deployed, versioned separately
- Scalable: Each service can scale horizontally as needed
- Team Autonomy: Teams can own and deliver microservices independently
- Technology Flexibility: Each service can use a different stack
- Fault Isolation: Failure in one service doesn’t crash the entire app
Disadvantages of Monolith Architecture
- Single Point of Failure: If one module crashes, entire app may go down
- Harder to Scale Selectively: Can’t scale a single module independently
- Tight Coupling Risk: Without discipline, modules may become tightly coupled
- Deployment Size: Always deploy everything, even for small changes
Disadvantages of Microservices Architecture
- Complexity Overhead: Requires handling service discovery, communication, retries, etc.
- DevOps Maturity Needed: CI/CD, monitoring, logging, and infrastructure automation are a must
- Communication Overhead: Services need to communicate over the network (can cause latency)
- Debugging Difficulty: Distributed tracing is complex
- Data Consistency: Maintaining ACID across services is hard
When to Choose Monolith vs Microservices in .NET
Condition | Choose Modular Monolith | Choose Microservices |
Startup / MVP | Yes | No |
Small to mid-size app | Yes | Not Worth It |
Team size < 5-10 | Yes | Too Complex |
Growing enterprise system | Maybe | Yes |
Independent scaling needs | No | Yes |
Separate team ownership per module | Hard | Easy |
DevOps maturity | Minimal | Must be High |
Start with a modular monolith to reduce complexity. Move to microservices only when your app outgrows the monolith and you need independent deployment, team scaling, or horizontal scaling of specific parts.
Final Words
Modular monoliths are great when you’re starting out or working with a small team. They keep things simple and easier to manage. As your app grows in scale and complexity, microservices offer the flexibility and independence teams need. If you’re at that stage, it may be time to hire .NET developers who can guide the transition and build scalable services.