How We Evaluated These Tools<\/b><\/p>\n

We compared each builder on platform support, backend and login setup, pricing and credits, code export, and scalability. Details were checked against official product and pricing pages in October 2026.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

10 Best AI App Builders for Non-Technical Founders in 2027<\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\n
Lovable: Best AI Web App Builder for Fast MVPs<\/h3>\n
$\"Lovable\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Lovable started life as GPT Engineer, an open-source project by Swedish founder Anton Osika, before it was renamed and turned into a full product. It has since become one of the best-known names among AI app builders.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Founders who want a polished web app MVP from prompts alone.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Prompt-to-full-stack web application, automatic backend with login and database from Supabase, two-way GitHub integration, and editing capabilities for minor changes.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Free plan, paid from about $25\/month<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros are fast, good-looking output and a backend set up for you. Cons are credits that drain during debugging and a last stretch of polish that often needs a developer.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> The strongest default for most non-technical founders building a web MVP. Skip it if you need a native mobile app.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
Base44: Best All-in-One AI Application Builder<\/h3>\n
$\"Base44\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Base44 was started by solo founder Maor Shlomo in 2025 and acquired by Wix the same year.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Founders who want one platform to handle everything.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Built-in backend, database, login, hosting, and integrations, all driven by chat.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Free plan available, paid plans start around $20 a month.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros are no separate backend setup and a quick path from idea to live app. Cons are less control than code-first tools and export options you should check before committing.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> A good fit if you want everything in one place and don’t plan to move your app later.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
Bolt.new: Best for Quick Browser Builds With Code Access<\/h3>\n
$\"Bolt.new\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Bolt.new comes from StackBlitz, the company behind a tool that runs a full development environment inside your browser. It launched in late 2024 and quickly became a popular way to build an app from a single prompt.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Founders who like seeing the code and want speed with zero setup.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Browser-based coding environment, full-stack app generation, real code you can export, and one-click deployment.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Free tier available; paid plans run on credits, so cost depends on how much you build.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros include speed, actual coding, and flexibility. Cons include the work environment, which is more like that for developers, and additional steps needed to have a persistent database.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> Pick it if you want code access and a faster start. If you want to compare it with developer-focused vibe coding tools<\/a>, our separate guide covers nine of them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
Replit Agent: Best for Building and Hosting in One Place<\/h3>\n
$\"Replit$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Replit began in 2016 as an online place to write and run code in the browser. Replit Agent, added in 2024, opened that coding platform to people who would rather describe an app than write it.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Founders willing to learn a little code in exchange for building and hosting in one place.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Browser IDE with an AI Agent that builds, hosts, and deploys apps, bundled backend and database, real code and live collaboration.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Free plan available; paid plans start around $25 a month.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros are building and hosting in one tool and full code access. Cons are usage costs that can climb and an interface that feels more technical than the rest.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> A strong pick if you want to understand what the AI is building. It is also the best option here for learning to code as you go.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
Anything: Best App Maker AI for Mobile First Ideas<\/h3>\n
$\"Anything\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Anything was previously known as Create before its rebrand. It is built for people who have an idea but no design or engineering background.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Founders with a mobile-first idea who want store publishing built into the workflow.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Chat-based app creation for web and mobile, database and login setup handled for you, and a focus on getting apps into the App Store.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Check the official site for current plans.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros are a mobile focus and a shorter route to publishing. Cons are a newer platform with a shorter track record than Bubble or Lovable.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> Worth testing for a mobile first idea. Start on the free tier if one is available before you commit to a paid plan.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
FlutterFlow: Best AI Mobile App Builder for Native Apps<\/h3>\n
$\"FlutterFlow\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
FlutterFlow is built on Flutter, Google’s open source UI toolkit, so the apps you design visually run on the same technology many professional developers use.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Founders who want a true native mobile app and can invest a few weeks learning.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Visual builder with AI generation, native iOS, Android and web output from one project, Firebase and Supabase connections and code export on paid plans.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Free plan available; check the official site for paid tiers.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros are real native output, fine control and code you can take with you. Cons are a steeper learning curve and a backend you usually connect yourself.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> The best AI mobile app builder here for founders who want control, or who plan to hire a freelancer to finish the job.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
Bubble: Best for Complex Web Apps and Marketplaces<\/h3>\n
$\"Bubble\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Bubble launched in 2012, which makes it one of the oldest no-code platforms still going. Its AI features sit on top of a visual editor that was around long before the AI wave.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Complex, database-heavy web apps and marketplaces.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Visual workflows, a mature database layer, a large plugin library and AI assisted app generation.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Paid plans start around $32 a month.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros are a proven platform, strong workflows and a deep plugin ecosystem. Cons are a steep learning curve, no code export and costs that rise with usage.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> A solid choice for a complex web product if you accept the lock-in. Expect to spend time learning it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
Adalo: Best for Simple Native Mobile Apps<\/h3>\n
$\"Adalo\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Adalo launched in 2018 as a no-code way to build mobile apps by placing components on a screen, long before prompt-based tools existed.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Simple native mobile apps built with drag and drop.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Visual builder for iOS and Android apps, AI-assisted app generation, built-in database and store publishing.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Free plan available; check the official site for paid tiers.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros are an easy learning curve and a clear route to the app stores. Cons are limited customization, slower performance on large datasets, and no code export.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> Good for a straightforward mobile app or a first validation round. Plan a rebuild if the product takes off.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
Glide: Best Low Cost Builder for Internal Tools<\/h3>\n
$\"Glide\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Glide launched in 2018 with a simple promise: turn the data you already have into an app in minutes. It has since grown from that idea into a wider no-code platform for business tools.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Internal tools and simple apps built on existing spreadsheet or database data.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Apps generated from Google Sheets, Airtable and similar sources, AI assisted creation, user logins and simple workflows.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Paid plans start around $19 a month on annual billing.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros are the lowest entry price and very quick setup. Cons are limited design control, no code export and little room for complex consumer products.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> Pick it for team tools and simple apps on data you already have. Skip it for anything customer facing and complex.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
Softr: Best for Client Portals and Member Directories<\/h3>\n
$\"Softr\"$ <\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
Softr was founded in 2019 and has always aimed at business teams rather than consumer app startups. That focus shows in what it does well and in what it leaves out.<\/p>\n
\n
Best for:<\/b> Client portals, directories and internal tools with user roles.<\/li>\n
Key features:<\/b> Portals and apps on top of Airtable, Google Sheets and other data sources, AI assisted building, permissions and user groups.<\/li>\n
Pricing:<\/b> Free plan available, check the official site for paid tiers.<\/li>\n
Pros and cons:<\/b> Pros include speedy portals and sufficient permissions. Cons include poor design options and pricing increasing with the number of users.<\/li>\n
Our verdict:<\/b> The easiest route to a client portal or member directory. Skip it for consumer apps.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
\n
Outgrowing your prototype already?<\/div>\n
Turn your AI-built prototype into a production ready product with us. <\/p>\n
Get Estimate<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Best AI App Builder by Use Case: Which Tool Should You Pick?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Founders don’t search for tool names. They search for problems. Looking for the best AI for creating apps usually comes down to one of these eight situations. If you want the best AI web app builder, Lovable and Bolt.new lead for speed, with Bubble as the heavier option. Web builders also sit inside the wider shift toward AI in web development<\/a>, so expect fast progress and frequent plan changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Search query<\/strong><\/td> Best fit<\/strong><\/td> Why<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Best AI app builder for non-coders<\/td> Lovable<\/strong><\/td> Prompt to full-stack web app with the backend set up for you<\/td><\/tr>
Build a mobile app without coding<\/td> FlutterFlow or Adalo<\/strong><\/td> Native iOS and Android output<\/td><\/tr>
Cheapest or free AI app builder<\/td> Glide<\/strong><\/td> Lowest listed paid entry price, and most tools here have free plans<\/td><\/tr>
App builder with database and login built in<\/td> Base44<\/strong><\/td> Backend, login and hosting included<\/td><\/tr>
Publish to the App Store without a developer<\/td> Anything or Adalo<\/strong><\/td> Store publishing is part of the workflow<\/td><\/tr>
Build an internal tool or client portal<\/td> Softr<\/strong><\/td> Portals with roles and permissions on your own data<\/td><\/tr>
Build a marketplace or community app<\/td> Bubble<\/strong><\/td> Mature workflows and plugins for database heavy apps<\/td><\/tr>
Export the code from an AI app builder<\/td> Lovable, Bolt.new or Replit<\/strong><\/td> Real code you can hand to a developer<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
AI App Builders Comparison: Features, Platforms and Pricing<\/h2>\n\n\n
Pricing note: The prices in this guide show publicly listed plans at the time of writing and are meant as a starting point, not a quote. AI app builders often change their plans, credit limits, and usage caps; many charge extra. Prices may also differ by region, billing cycle (monthly or annual), and taxes. Always check each tool’s official pricing page before you commit, and confirm what a plan includes before you budget for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tool<\/strong><\/td> Best for<\/strong><\/td> Platform<\/strong><\/td> Code export<\/strong><\/td> Starting price<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Lovable<\/strong><\/td> Polished web MVPs<\/td> Web<\/td> Yes, GitHub sync<\/td> Free plan, paid from about $25\/mo<\/td><\/tr>
Base44<\/strong><\/td> All in one apps<\/td> Web<\/td> Check plan<\/td> Free plan, paid from about $20\/mo<\/td><\/tr>
Bolt.new<\/strong><\/td> Quick browser builds<\/td> Web<\/td> Yes<\/td> Free tier, credit based<\/td><\/tr>
Replit Agent<\/strong><\/td> Build plus hosting<\/td> Web<\/td> Yes<\/td> Free plan, paid from about $25\/mo<\/td><\/tr>
Anything<\/strong><\/td> Mobile first ideas<\/td> Web and mobile<\/td> Check plan<\/td> Check site<\/td><\/tr>
FlutterFlow<\/strong><\/td> Native mobile apps<\/td> iOS, Android, web<\/td> Yes, paid plans<\/td> Free plan, check site<\/td><\/tr>
Bubble<\/strong><\/td> Complex web apps<\/td> Web<\/td> No<\/td> Paid from about $32\/mo<\/td><\/tr>
Adalo<\/strong><\/td> Simple mobile apps<\/td> iOS, Android, web<\/td> No<\/td> Free plan, check site<\/td><\/tr>
Glide<\/strong><\/td> Data driven tools<\/td> Web<\/td> No<\/td> Paid from about $19\/mo (annual)<\/td><\/tr>
Softr<\/strong><\/td> Portals and directories<\/td> Web<\/td> No<\/td> Free plan, check site<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
How to Choose the Best AI App Builder: 5 Steps for Founders<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
$\"Steps$ <\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Let’s break it down. Skip the demo videos and run every tool through these five checks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 1: Define your app type and core use case<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
A marketplace, a consumer mobile app and a client portal need very different tools. Write down who uses the app, what they do in it, and what data it stores. If your idea is simple screens over a spreadsheet, no code apps<\/a> built on tools like Glide or Softr may be enough. If it needs custom logic, look at the prompt-to-code tools.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 2: Check what it can ship<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
There are some app development programs that build websites only, while others create native Android and iOS applications. When you need an application builder, make sure it is capable of publishing to stores before paying for it. Choose the platform for your users as early as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 3: Look at backend, database and login support<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
This is where most beginners get stuck. Ask whether the tool sets up user accounts, a database and security rules for you, or expects you to connect your own service. A built-in backend saves days. A bring your own backend gives you more control but needs technical comfort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 4: Compare pricing, credits and usage limits<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Price is not always reflected in the sticker. Many tools have usage-based or credit-based pricing, which means that one may use up the monthly limit in just a debugging session. Be sure to compare what is included in the free plan, how much a custom domain costs, etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 5: Check code ownership and export options<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Is there a way that you will be able to give your code to a developer in the future? There are coding tools like Lovable, Bolt.new, and Replit that provide you with actual code, while there are no-code tools like Bubble and Glide that don’t.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
Have an app idea but no technical team?<\/div>\n
Our AI experts help you pick the right path and launch faster.<\/p>\n
Contact Us<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Limitations of AI App Builders Every Founder Should Know<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
AI app builders are great at speed. They are weaker at the boring, serious parts of software.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Security and data privacy gaps:<\/strong> The generated applications could have some issues relating to the security and access policies that are poorly set up. If your app handles payments, personal information or health data, get an independent review first, ideally through AI consulting services<\/a> or a proper security audit. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
Performance and scaling ceilings:<\/strong> A prototype for 50 users is not an application for 50,000 users. Database management, loading, and caching may be generic features; therefore, performance will drop as you scale. <\/li>\n\n\n\n
Credit burn and hidden costs:<\/strong> Prompts, retries, and debugging all use credits. With custom domains, additional seats, backend requests, and storage fees, the cost becomes significant.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
Vendor lock-in:<\/strong> Without export of the code, your product becomes hostage to another company’s platform. If the prices change or the platform disappears, you have to begin from scratch.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
When to Move From an AI App Builder to Custom App Development<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
AI app builders are good for validation but rarely the end goal. Look out for the following signals that it is time for a change:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Your logic breaks down constantly: <\/strong>Every correction leads to another issue, while more triggers do not solve the problem.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
Real users are arriving:<\/strong> Traffic, payments, or sensitive data raise the stakes fast.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
Integration requirements grow deep:<\/strong> ERP systems, CRM, or banking cannot be implemented into templates.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
It becomes too costly:<\/strong> Increasing credits and plans can eat up the development budget.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
Investors ask for code ownership:<\/strong> Due diligence wants a codebase you own and can audit.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe smart path for various founders is simple. Validate with an AI builder, then hand the prototype to a team that can turn it into production software. A working prototype makes a great brief; it can speed up an AI-powered MVP development<\/a> engagement, and later you can learn how to integrate AI into an app<\/a> without rebuilding it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Factor<\/strong><\/td> AI app builder<\/strong><\/td> Custom development partner<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Speed to first version<\/td> Hours to days<\/td> Weeks<\/td><\/tr>
Upfront cost<\/td> Low<\/td> Higher<\/td><\/tr>
Control and code ownership<\/td> Varies by tool<\/td> Full<\/td><\/tr>
Scalability and security<\/td> Limited, check carefully<\/td> Built around your needs<\/td><\/tr>
Best for<\/td> Validation and early MVPs<\/td> Production, scale and compliance<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Why Choose CMARIX as Your AI App Development Company<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
If your idea has outgrown a prototype, CMARIX can take it from here. We are an AI app development company founded in 2009, and we have built software for startups and enterprises across 40+ industries. Founders come to us after an AI builder gets them to a working demo and they need a product that handles real users, real data and real revenue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here is what you get when you work with us:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
Prototype to production:<\/strong> We review your AI-built prototype, keep what already works and rebuild the parts that won’t scale, such as the data model, login and integrations.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
AI engineering depth:<\/strong> Our engineers develop AI features into real products, so your app can grow beyond what a template allows.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
Security and process you can verify:<\/strong> We hold ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 27001 certifications, so quality and data security are part of how we deliver.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThrough our AI software development<\/a> practice we build production ready products, and our AI app development services<\/a> cover everything from AI features to full applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Conclusion: Picking the Best AI App Builder for Your Startup<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The best AI app builders have made it possible to test an idea before you spend serious money. Lovable, Base44 and Bolt.new suit fast web MVPs, FlutterFlow and Adalo suit native mobile apps, and Glide and Softr cover internal tools and portals. The right pick comes down to your app type, how much backend the tool handles, how credits are priced and whether you can export your code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Treat every pricing page as a moving target and every prototype as a starting point. Use an AI app builder to prove demand, then bring in engineers when users, data and revenue raise the stakes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
FAQs About the Best AI App Builders<\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
What are the best AI app builders right now?<\/h3>\n
\n\n
It depends on the use case as to which are the best AI app builder tools. Lovable is the best AI app builder for web MVPs, while Base44 works for one-stop builds. Bolt.new and Replit provide access to code. FlutterFlow and Adalo build native mobile applications, whereas Bubble provides complex web apps.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Can a non-technical founder build an enterprise-ready app with an AI powered app builder?<\/h3>\n
\n\n
For prototypes, pilots and internal tools, yes. For enterprise needs like strict security reviews, compliance, single sign-on and heavy traffic, most founders will need developers or an AI app development company to harden the product. Use the builder to validate, then invest in the production version.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
What is the difference between standard no-code tools and AI powered app development platforms?<\/h3>\n
\n\n
Standard no-code tools give you blocks to drag and drop, and you assemble the app yourself. AI powered platforms generate screens, logic and data from a plain language prompt, so you start with a draft. Many tools now blend both approaches.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
How does a generative AI app builder turn text prompts into working code?<\/h3>\n
\n\n
A large language model reads your prompt, plans the screens, data model and logic, then generates code or configuration and wires up a backend. You see a live preview and refine it with follow-up prompts. Clear prompts give better results, and complex logic still needs human review.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Can I deploy a cross-platform app with a free AI mobile app builder?<\/h3>\n
\n\n
Several tools offer free plans, but free tiers usually limit publishing, branding and store submission. Test your idea on the free plan, then expect to move to a paid plan to publish. Apple and Google also charge their own developer account fees.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
What should I look for when choosing the best no-code AI app builder?<\/h3>\n
\n\n
Check five things: the app type and platform it supports, backend and login handling, pricing and credit limits, code ownership and export, and how far it scales. The five step checklist earlier in this guide walks through each one in order.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
How do I publish an app made with an AI app creator to the App Store?<\/h3>\n
\n\n
Enroll in the Apple Developer Program, confirm your builder supports store builds, then prepare your icon, screenshots and privacy policy. Some builders handle the build and submission for you, while others export a project you open in Xcode. Allow time for Apple’s review, since rejections happen.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
When should an early-stage startup move from an AI builder to professional AI app development services?<\/h3>\n
\n\n
Move when logic keeps breaking, real users and payment arrive, integrations get complex, or monthly costs approach a development budget. Investor questions about code ownership are another clear sign. Keep the prototype as a working spec for the team that builds the production version.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Quick Summary: The best AI app builders let non-technical founders turn a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":54246,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54228"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54228\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54249,"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54228\/revisions\/54249"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54246"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cmarix.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}